| 
1ª Sessão: Inovação
como Processo Social I. Abordagens Econômicas
Leituras:
Coombs, R., M. Harvey & B. Tether, “Analysing
Distributed Innovation Processes”, CRIC
Discussion paper No.43, 2001.
Lundvall, B-A, “Globalisation and the Innovation
Process” in The Globalising Learning Economy,
TSER programme, DGXII, Commission of the European
Union, 1997.
Storper, M., “Innovation as Collective Action”,
in The Regional World, Guildford.
2ª Sessão: Inovação
Como Processo Social II. Abordagens Sociológicas
Leituras:
Beckert, J. “Economic Action and Embeddedness:
The Problem of the Structure of Action”
(mimeo) 1999.
Bijker, W. et al The Social Construction of Technological
Systems, 1988.
Callon, M. “The State and Technical Innovation:
A Case Study of the Electrical Vehicle Industry”,
in Mapping the Dynamics of Science and Technology
eds. Callon, M., J. Law & A. Rip, 1986.
3ª Sessão: Interpretações
de Consumo
Leituras:
Bauman, Z. “Consuming Life” in Journal
of Consumer Culture, Vol 1 No. 1, 2001.
Rochefort, R. Le Consommateur Entrepreneur,Ed.
Odile Jacob, 1997, Paris.
Wilkinson, J. Consumer Society: What Opportunities
for New expressions of Citizenship and Control?
in Reimagining Growth, Dymski G. & S. de Paula,
2003.
4ª Sessão: Consumo como Componente
do Sistema de Inovação
Leituras:
Callon, M., C. Méadel & V. Rabeharisoa,
“The Economy of Qualities” in Economy
and Society, Vol 31 No. 2, 2002.
Green, K., B. Morton & S. New, “Greening
Organisations: Purchasing, Consumption and Innovation”
in Innovation by Demand Eds. Mc Meekin, A., K.
Green, M. Tomlinson & V. Walsh, 2002.
Walsh, V., C. Cohen & A. Richards “The
Incorporation of User Needs in Telecom Product
Design” in Innovation by Demand (op.cit).
5ª Sessão: Inovação
e o Consumidor Cidadão
Leituras:
Burgess, A. “Flattering Consumption”,
in Journal of Consumer Culture, Vol. 1. No. 1,
2001.
Elam, M. & M. Bertilsson, “Consuming,
Engaging and Confronting Science: The Emerging
Dimensions of Scientific Citizenship”, STAGE,
European Commission, 2002.
Wynne, B. “Risk and Environment as Legitimatory
Discourses of Technology” Current Sociology,
May, 2002.
|